0
0
You took the test because a friend would not stop talking about it. Ten minutes of questions, and then a result — four letters, or a number, or a colour. And the strange part was how much of it was true. Not vaguely true. Specifically true. The bit about needing a quiet hour after a long day. The bit about hating to be rushed.
That part is good. Being seen is always good.
The trouble starts later, when the result stops describing you and starts speaking for you. I can’t do that, I’m not that type. Don’t ask me, I’m a Nine. A word that began as a description quietly turns into a fence.
So the question most people are really asking when they search are personality tests biblical is not “is this occult?” It is quieter than that. It is: am I allowed to be more than my result?
Are Personality Tests Biblical?
Here is the honest answer. The Bible never mentions personality tests, never forbids them, and never uses anything like them. There is no verse for and no verse against. So a personality test is not sinful — and it is not scriptural either. It sits outside the question the Bible is actually asking about people.
It helps to know where these tools come from. The Myers-Briggs assessment was built by Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers, drawing on the ideas of Carl Jung. The Enneagram’s nine types, in the form used today, are generally traced to Oscar Ichazo in the 1960s and Claudio Naranjo in the 1970s, who mapped psychological meaning onto a much older symbol. These are modern tools with modern histories. That is not an accusation. It is just what they are.
And they are honest about their own limits, if you read the fine print. The Myers-Briggs Company, which publishes the test, says about 50 percent of people get the same four-letter type when they take it again — while about 90 percent match on three or four of the letters.
Read both halves of that, because both matter. The test is measuring something real. It is also measuring something that moves.
Which makes it a decent description of a person, and a poor verdict on one.
Scripture Has No Type System At All
Go looking for categories in the Bible and you will find plenty. Tribes. Trades. Ages. Nations. What you will not find anywhere is a system that sorts people by temperament and then hands each one a label to carry around.
The closest thing is the list of spiritual gifts — and even those are jobs inside a body of people, not labels for a self. Paul writes such a list more than once, and the lists do not match. Romans 12 names things like teaching, giving and showing mercy. First Corinthians 12 names wisdom, knowledge, faith, healing and more. If these were meant to be fixed boxes, you would expect the boxes to stay the same from one letter to the next. They do not.
This is worth sitting with for a moment, because the instinct to find the true, final description of yourself is very old and not always wise. We looked at that instinct once before, in the famous line “to thine own self be true” — which has two more lines nobody quotes, and which Shakespeare put in the mouth of a man who was about to lie about his own son. Self-knowledge as the last word has a shakier pedigree than people think.
What scripture does instead is stranger. And once you see it, you cannot stop seeing it.
God Does Not Assign Types. God Hands Out New Names.
Abram becomes Abraham: “Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee” (Genesis 17:5). He has no children when that is said to him. The name is not a summary of the man. It is a direction he is being pointed in.
Jacob becomes Israel: “Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed” (Genesis 32:28).
Simon becomes Cephas the first time Jesus lays eyes on him — before he has done one single thing to earn it. “Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone” (John 1:42).
Every one of those names points forward. Not one of them summarises the past.
The example everyone uses is not actually a name change
Here is the thing that surprised me while working on this, and it changes the shape of the point.
Almost every version of this conversation includes “Saul became Paul.” It is the go-to example. And scripture never says it happened.
He meets Jesus on the Damascus road in Acts chapter 9 — and he is still called Saul in that same chapter, where Ananias greets him as “Brother Saul” (Acts 9:17). He is still Saul in chapters 11, 12 and 13. When the switch finally arrives, the wording is not a renaming at all: “Then Saul, (who also is called Paul,)” (Acts 13:9).
He had both names the whole time. Saul was his Hebrew name; Paulus was his Roman one. Plenty of people in that world carried two, and he simply starts going by the one that travelled better as his work moves out into Roman cities.
Which quietly makes the point better than the legend did. God is not in the business of deleting who you were.
Jacob is the proof. He is renamed a second time, years later, at Bethel (Genesis 35:10) — as if once did not take. And even after both renamings, God still calls him by the old name: “God spake unto Israel in the visions of the night, and said, Jacob, Jacob” (Genesis 46:2).
The old name stays. It just stops being the whole story. Scripture keeps doing this — giving a name to exactly the people whose category had already ruled them out. We traced the same move through Isaiah 56 in a piece on the childless, where the promise is “a name better than of sons and of daughters” to people the law had shut outside the door.
The Man Hiding in the Winepress
The clearest picture of all this is a man who would have failed his own personality test badly.
“And there came an angel of the LORD, and sat under an oak which was in Ophrah, that pertained unto Joash the Abi-ezrite: and his son Gideon threshed wheat by the winepress, to hide it from the Midianites” (Judges 6:11).
You need one piece of background for that line to land. Threshing wheat was open-air work, done up on high ground, because you need wind to carry the light chaff away from the heavy grain. A winepress is the opposite — a pit, cut down into rock, sheltered and low.
So Gideon is doing hilltop work down in a hole. He is doing it badly, on purpose, because he is frightened of being seen. That is the man on the page.
And then: “And the angel of the LORD appeared unto him, and said unto him, The LORD is with thee, thou mighty man of valour” (Judges 6:12).
Mighty man of valour. Said to a man hiding in a pit.
The Answer That Does Not Argue With the Data
Gideon does what most of us would do. He pushes back with his profile.
“Oh my Lord, wherewith shall I save Israel? behold, my family is poor in Manasseh, and I am the least in my father’s house” (Judges 6:15).
Notice how he argues. Not with feelings — with data. Clan ranking. Family status. Position among his brothers. He answers with a result sheet. Here is my type. Here is what the numbers say I am.
And here is the part I never noticed before, the part that turns this whole question around.
God does not dispute a single line of it.
“And the LORD said unto him, Surely I will be with thee, and thou shalt smite the Midianites as one man” (Judges 6:16).
No correction. No “actually, you are braver than you think.” No argument about the clan, the family, the ranking, the hiding. God simply adds the one factor that was never on Gideon’s sheet, and could never have been: I will be with thee.
That is the whole thing. Your type is a measurement of you alone. It has to be — that is all a test can reach. It cannot include the presence of God, because there is no question on the form for that.
A test can measure everything about you except who is standing with you.
Gideon’s assessment of himself was probably accurate. He really was the least in his father’s house. It just was not the relevant number any more.
What a Type Can Tell You, and What It Cannot
None of this means the tests are worthless. Being even-handed matters here, because most of what is written on this subject is either a warning or a sales pitch.
A good result can name a pattern you had felt but never had words for. It can explain to your family why a long noisy day empties you out and fills your sister up. It can make you kinder about a difference you used to take personally. Those are real gifts, and a lot of homes are calmer because of them.
A result cannot tell you what you will become. It cannot see who is with you. And it was never built to have the last word on a person, however confidently it is written.
We host a free personality colour quiz here ourselves, and we mean it exactly that way — enjoy it, learn something true, then hold it loosely. A door is a good thing. A door is not a room you live in.
There is one last picture worth putting beside all of this. In Revelation, the promise to the one who overcomes is “a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it” (Revelation 2:17).
A name nobody else can read.
You could not post it in a bio. You could not find your people by it, because a type needs other people in the category with you, and this one has a category of one. Whatever God finally calls you, it is not a group you belong to. It is a name that belongs to you.
Actions to Take
- Write down the sentence. The one you say most often that starts “I’m just not a ___ person.” Put it on paper and read it back to yourself. Then ask the only question that matters about it: is that a description, or is it a fence?
- Read Judges 6:11-16 slowly, once. It takes two minutes. Pay attention to what God does not say to Gideon — no argument, no correction, no pep talk. Just presence.
- Do one small thing today that your type says you are bad at. Not a big thing. Send the message you have been putting off. Ask the practical question you have decided is somebody else’s job. One small act against the label, done today.
Journaling Prompts
- Which part of your result were you relieved to read? And what did that relief quietly give you permission to stop trying?
- Someone spoke a name over you long before any test did — a word about what kind of person you are. Whose voice was it, and are you still living inside it?
- If God addressed you the way Gideon was addressed — by what you could become rather than by what you are doing right now — what do you think the word would be?
A Prayer
God, I have got comfortable behind my own description of myself. Some of it is honest, and some of it has just become a good place to hide. Thank you that you do not seem to argue with my list of reasons — you just say you will be with me. Help me believe that today, in the small ordinary thing I have been avoiding. Amen.
A Question for You
Do personality tests help people understand each other better — or do they hand people a polite way to stop trying? Tell us what you think in the comments.
Share This
- Gideon told God he was the least in his father’s house. God didn’t argue with the data. God just said, “I will be with thee.” Your type measures you alone. It has no box for who’s standing next to you.
- Everybody says “Saul became Paul.” Scripture never says it. Acts 13:9 — “Then Saul, (who also is called Paul,)”. He had both names all along. God doesn’t delete who you were.
- A personality test can describe you. It cannot tell you what you’ll become — and it can’t see who’s with you. Hold the result loosely.
Questions People Ask
Are personality tests biblical?
The Bible never mentions personality tests, never commands them and never forbids them. Scripture contains no system that sorts people by temperament and assigns them a label. That means a personality test is neither sinful nor scriptural — it is a modern tool that sits outside what the Bible is doing with people. The Bible’s own move is different: it repeatedly gives people new names that describe where they are going rather than what they currently are.
Is the Enneagram Christian?
No. The Enneagram is not a Christian system and does not come from scripture. Its nine personality types, in the form used today, are generally traced to Oscar Ichazo, who began mapping psychological meaning onto an older symbol in the 1960s, and to Claudio Naranjo, who developed and taught it in the United States from the 1970s. Many Christians use it as a self-awareness tool; others avoid it because of those origins. Scripture itself takes no position on it, for or against.
Did God change Saul’s name to Paul?
No — scripture never records that. Saul is still called Saul after his conversion in Acts chapter 9, where Ananias greets him as “Brother Saul” (Acts 9:17), and through several chapters after that. Acts 13:9 simply says, “Then Saul, (who also is called Paul,)”. He carried both names at once: Saul was his Hebrew name and Paulus his Roman one, which was common for a Jewish man who was also a Roman citizen. The genuine renamings in scripture are people like Abram to Abraham (Genesis 17:5) and Jacob to Israel (Genesis 32:28).
What does the Bible say about identity?
Scripture treats identity as a direction rather than a category. God renames Abram to Abraham while he is still childless, promising him a future he cannot yet see (Genesis 17:5). Jesus calls Simon “a stone” the first time they meet, before Simon has done anything to deserve it (John 1:42). And 1 Samuel 16:7 says that “man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.” The consistent pattern is that God addresses people by what they are being drawn toward, not by a fixed description of what they already are.
Why was Gideon threshing wheat in a winepress?
Because he was hiding from the Midianites (Judges 6:11). Threshing wheat was normally done out in the open on high ground, where the wind could blow the light chaff away from the heavy grain. A winepress was the opposite of that — a pit cut down into rock, sheltered and out of sight. Gideon was doing hilltop work down in a hole so he would not be seen. It is in that moment, not after any change in him, that he is greeted as “thou mighty man of valour” (Judges 6:12).
