{"id":119947,"date":"2026-11-09T08:40:40","date_gmt":"2026-11-09T13:40:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/?p=119947"},"modified":"2026-11-09T08:40:40","modified_gmt":"2026-11-09T13:40:40","slug":"between-stimulus-and-response-there-is-a-space-who-said-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/quotes\/between-stimulus-and-response-there-is-a-space-who-said-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Said &#8220;Between Stimulus and Response There Is a Space&#8221;? Not Frankl"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='booster-block booster-read-block'>\n                <div class=\"twp-read-time\">\n                \t<i class=\"booster-icon twp-clock\"><\/i> <span>Read Time:<\/span>15 Minute, 27 Second                <\/div>\n\n            <\/div><p>You have almost certainly met this one, and you have almost certainly seen a name under it.<\/p>\n\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p>The name underneath is nearly always Viktor Frankl. But nobody has been able to find those words in anything Frankl wrote. The Viktor Frankl Institute in Vienna, which looks after his work, keeps a page about this exact sentence on its own website, filed under the heading &#8220;Alleged quote.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n<p>The trail leads somewhere else entirely \u2014 to Stephen R. Covey, who said he found the words in a library book whose title and author he never wrote down, and who never claimed them as his own either.<\/p>\n\n<p>That is the short answer. The longer one is better, because it involves a lost library, a psychologist who has never been given the credit, and a phrase that started life as an argument rather than an encouragement.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Where &#8220;between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221; first appears in print<\/h2>\n\n<p>The Frankl connection is real, and it starts with Covey.<\/p>\n\n<p>In <em>The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People<\/em> (Simon &amp; Schuster, 1989), Covey wrote about Frankl&#8217;s freedom, or power, to choose \u2014 and placed that freedom between what happened to Frankl, the stimulus, and his response. That is Covey describing Frankl&#8217;s idea in Covey&#8217;s words. It is not a quotation from Frankl, and it was never presented as one.<\/p>\n\n<p>The sentence in the form people now share it appears in print five years later, in <em>First Things First<\/em> (1994), written by Covey with A. Roger Merrill and Rebecca R. Merrill. Covey said there that he had come across the passage in a book, and that what he was giving was the essence of it.<\/p>\n\n<p>&#8220;The essence of it&#8221; is a writer telling you plainly that he is working from memory.<\/p>\n\n<p>Over the years he told the story of where he found it, and the details are worth having:<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>He had been reading in a university library in Hawaii. In a 2004 foreword he dated it to 1969, a sabbatical year.<\/li>\n<li>A passage about a gap between stimulus and response stopped him, and he thought it put Frankl&#8217;s thinking beautifully.<\/li>\n<li>He never noted down the author or the title.<\/li>\n<li>In a 2008 foreword he gave the wording a little differently again \u2014 and mentioned that when he returned to Hawaii years later, the library building was gone.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>Read that last line slowly. The one person who ever saw the original page could not find the room again.<\/p>\n\n<p>So this is not a case of someone putting a famous name on a sentence to give it weight. It is a man summarising a book he admired, saying out loud that he was summarising, and the attribution hardening quietly over the next thirty years of retellings until the &#8220;roughly, as I remember it&#8221; fell off and only the name was left.<\/p>\n\n<p>That is how nearly all of these happen. It is the same shape as the line everyone gives to Spider-Man&#8217;s Uncle Ben, which we traced in <a href=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/entertainment\/with-great-power-comes-great-responsibility-origin\/\">who really said &#8220;with great power comes great responsibility&#8221;<\/a> \u2014 nobody lied, the sentence just got passed along until the source dropped out of the retelling.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"convertkit-form wp-block-convertkit-form\" style=\"\"><script async data-uid=\"c87e3ed518\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.kit.com\/c87e3ed518\/index.js\" data-jetpack-boost=\"ignore\" data-no-defer=\"1\" data-no-optimize=\"1\" nowprocket><\/script><\/div>\n\n\n<h2>The best candidate is a psychologist whose name never got attached<\/h2>\n\n<p>If Covey read it in 1969, somebody had to have written it by then. The strongest candidate anyone has produced is Rollo May.<\/p>\n\n<p>Research published by Quote Investigator points to a 1963 essay of May&#8217;s, &#8220;Freedom and Responsibility Re-Examined,&#8221; in a volume called <em>Behavioral Science and Guidance: Proposals and Perspectives<\/em> from Teachers College, Columbia University. In it May described freedom as the capacity to pause between stimulus and response, and described mental health as an awareness of the gap between stimulus and response.<\/p>\n\n<p>The dates work. 1963 comes before 1969, and a university library is exactly where a volume like that would sit.<\/p>\n\n<p>The idea was unmistakably May&#8217;s own, too \u2014 he kept returning to it for the rest of his life. It turns up again in <em>The Courage to Create<\/em> (1975), and again in <em>Freedom and Destiny<\/em> (1981), where he describes the human capacity to pause in the face of many competing stimuli and then choose a response. Those books came out too late to be what Covey read on his sabbatical, but they show a man circling the same thought for twenty years.<\/p>\n\n<p>Two further things in the record make this stranger than an ordinary mix-up.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>The phrase was already being shortened before Covey ever got to Hawaii.<\/strong> In 1967, an educator named C. Harold McCully condensed May&#8217;s point in a journal called <em>Guidelines<\/em>, citing May&#8217;s 1963 article as his source. A compressed version was circulating in American education writing two years before Covey&#8217;s sabbatical year.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>And the wording goes back further than psychology.<\/strong> Quote Investigator also found a 1917 book by Thomas Walton Galloway, <em>The Use of Motives in Teaching Morals and Religion<\/em>, which describes a &#8220;third region&#8221; lying &#8220;between stimulus and response&#8221; and says that is where our real personal values live. Not the same sentence. But the same three words, doing the same job, a century ago.<\/p>\n\n<p>Now here is the part that nobody repeating the quote today knows.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>&#8220;Stimulus and response&#8221; is not Frankl&#8217;s vocabulary, and it did not begin as encouragement.<\/strong> It is the language of behaviourist psychology \u2014 the school that studied human beings as organisms that take an input and produce an output. Rollo May spent his career arguing against exactly that picture of a person. He is one of the founders of existential psychology in America, and his whole project was insisting that people are more than things that react.<\/p>\n\n<p>So he reached for the behaviourists&#8217; own two words, and planted something in the middle of them. The phrase is a rebuttal wearing the other side&#8217;s uniform.<\/p>\n\n<p>Which gives the story its final twist. In 2001, someone posting on a public internet discussion group credited the line to B. F. Skinner \u2014 the single most famous name in the psychology it was written to argue against. Quote Investigator notes, mildly, that this is implausible.<\/p>\n\n<h2>What Frankl actually wrote is the bigger claim, not the smaller one<\/h2>\n\n<p>None of this takes anything away from Frankl, and it is worth being clear about why the sentence stuck to him in the first place: it sounds like him. Logotherapy, the approach Frankl founded, rests on the freedom of the will. A line about the freedom to choose your response is not foreign to his thinking at all. Covey was not reaching.<\/p>\n\n<p>But Frankl&#8217;s own sentence on this is a different size.<\/p>\n\n<p>In <em>Man&#8217;s Search for Meaning<\/em>, he writes about the people in the camps who walked through the huts comforting others and giving away their last piece of bread. They were few, he says, but they were enough to prove that everything can be taken from a person except one thing \u2014 what his English translation calls the last of the human freedoms: to choose your own attitude in whatever circumstances you are given, and to choose your own way.<\/p>\n\n<p>One small note on the wording, because it matters for this kind of detective work. English readers meet Frankl in translation, through Ilse Lasch, and the sentence appears with small variations across editions and printings. There is no single official English sentence to hold a paraphrase up against. That is part of why loose summaries attach to him so easily \u2014 there is nothing fixed to bounce off.<\/p>\n\n<p>Set the two claims side by side and the difference is not small.<\/p>\n\n<p>The popular sentence describes a gap between something happening and your reaction to it. It is useful. It is the breath before you reply to the email, the two seconds before you say the thing you cannot take back.<\/p>\n\n<p>Frankl&#8217;s sentence was written by a man whose wife, mother, father and brother were killed, and who lost the manuscript he had sewn into the lining of his coat. It is not advice about reacting well. It is a claim about what a human being <em>is<\/em> \u2014 that there is something in a person which cannot be confiscated, even by people who have taken everything else.<\/p>\n\n<p>One of those is a technique. The other is a statement about human dignity. The version on the posters is the smaller of the two.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you want the larger one, it is worth knowing that his book gets flattened in other ways too \u2014 we looked at that in <a href=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/entertainment\/mans-search-for-meaning-explained\/\">what Frankl never actually said about suffering<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Why the difference matters when someone is having a hard week<\/h2>\n\n<p>This is the bit that lifts it above trivia.<\/p>\n\n<p>The small version gets handed to people in the big situation. &#8220;There&#8217;s a space between stimulus and response&#8221; is good advice in traffic and in your inbox. Said to someone three days after a diagnosis, or in the second week after a funeral, it changes into something else. It becomes a performance note. <em>There was a space, and you used it badly.<\/em><\/p>\n\n<p>Frankl&#8217;s actual sentence never asks anyone for a better reaction. It does not grade you. It says something cannot be taken from you. In a hard week those two messages point in opposite directions, and only one of them helps.<\/p>\n\n<p>There is a smaller injustice here as well. Rollo May appears to have lost his name on one of his own best ideas \u2014 a thought he spent two decades developing, written as a defence of human freedom, now circulating under someone else&#8217;s name entirely. Giving it back costs nothing.<\/p>\n\n<p>And nobody reading this should feel caught out. Almost everyone who repeats this line got it from a book, a talk, a counsellor, a sermon or a friend, and it arrived already signed. We had it filed under the wrong name here too. A quote with a famous name on it is one of the few things people never think to check, precisely because it looks like it has already been checked.<\/p>\n\n<h2>The pause had a much older name<\/h2>\n\n<p>Notice what is not in dispute in any of this. Not one person in the story doubts that the space is real. May, Covey, Frankl in his own way, the man in 1917 \u2014 they are all describing something you recognise the moment it is named. That half-second where the thing has happened and you are not yet committed.<\/p>\n\n<p>It got described a very long time before there was a psychology to describe it. Here it is in Proverbs:<\/p>\n\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The heart of the righteous studieth to answer: but the mouth of the wicked poureth out evil things.&#8221; \u2014 Proverbs 15:28<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n<p>Two people. The same moment. The same thing just said to both of them.<\/p>\n\n<p>One of them studies. The other pours.<\/p>\n\n<p>&#8220;Studieth to answer&#8221; is the space, written down roughly three thousand years ago by someone with no word for stimulus and no interest in behavioural science. And look at which part of the person does the pausing. Not the mouth. The heart. The gap is not a timing trick you pick up at a seminar \u2014 in that sentence, it is a readout of what someone has slowly become.<\/p>\n\n<p>There is no reason to think Rollo May or Stephen Covey had that verse anywhere in mind, and nothing here claims they did. The interesting thing is the opposite, and it is better: people keep arriving at this same small discovery, from completely unconnected directions, century after century \u2014 and keep needing to be told again.<\/p>\n\n<h2>So what do you do with the sentence on the wall?<\/h2>\n\n<p>Keep it. As far as anyone can tell it is true, and it is useful, and finding out who wrote it does not make it less so. It just turns out to be unsigned, or signed in the wrong hand.<\/p>\n\n<p>The honest version of its history is longer and much less tidy. A thought that may begin with Rollo May in 1963, in an essay arguing against a psychology that said people only react. Condensed by an educator in 1967. Found in a Hawaii library in 1969 by a man who did not note the title. Printed in 1994 as the essence of something half-remembered. And then attached, over thirty years of good-faith retelling, to someone who had written something larger and never said this at all.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you are going to carry one of them into a hard week, carry Frankl&#8217;s. Not that you have a space in which to respond well.<\/p>\n\n<p>That there is something in you nobody gets to take.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Something to Sit With<\/h2>\n\n<p>Which quote have you always had signed with the wrong name \u2014 and how did you find out? And while we are here: is there a saying you have always assumed was somewhere in the Bible, that you have never actually gone looking for? Tell us in the comments, because those are often the best ones.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"convertkit-form wp-block-convertkit-form\" style=\"\"><script async data-uid=\"c87e3ed518\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.kit.com\/c87e3ed518\/index.js\" data-jetpack-boost=\"ignore\" data-no-defer=\"1\" data-no-optimize=\"1\" nowprocket><\/script><\/div>\n\n\n<h2>Share This<\/h2>\n\n<ul>\n<li>TIL &#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221; probably isn&#8217;t Viktor Frankl. The Frankl Institute in Vienna files it on its own website under &#8220;Alleged quote.&#8221; Stephen Covey said he found it in a library book and never wrote down the author.<\/li>\n<li>The saddest detail in the hunt for &#8220;between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221;: Stephen Covey said he read it in a university library in Hawaii around 1969, never noted the title, and when he went back years later the library building was gone. The only person who ever saw that page couldn&#8217;t find the room again.<\/li>\n<li>Just learned that &#8220;stimulus and response&#8221; in that famous quote is behaviourist vocabulary \u2014 the psychology that said people only react. Rollo May borrowed their own two words to argue there was a space in between them. Then in 2001 someone online credited the line to B. F. Skinner.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Questions People Are Asking<\/h2>\n\n<p><strong>Did Viktor Frankl say &#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221;?<\/strong><br>\nThere is no evidence that he did. &#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221; has not been found in any of Viktor Frankl&#8217;s published writing, and the Viktor Frankl Institute in Vienna, which looks after his work, keeps a page about this specific sentence on its own website under the heading &#8220;Alleged quote.&#8221; That is a careful claim rather than a flat denial \u2014 researchers can show that nobody has located it in his work, which is not quite the same as proving he never wrote it anywhere. What is clear is that the sentence reached the public through Stephen R. Covey, who said he found it in a book in a university library and never recorded the author or the title.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>Who really said &#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221;?<\/strong><br>\nNobody can say for certain, and that uncertainty is the honest answer. The strongest candidate is the American existential psychologist Rollo May. Research published by Quote Investigator points to May&#8217;s 1963 essay &#8220;Freedom and Responsibility Re-Examined,&#8221; in a volume called <em>Behavioral Science and Guidance: Proposals and Perspectives<\/em> from Teachers College, Columbia University, where May described freedom as the capacity to pause between stimulus and response. May returned to the idea in his own books <em>The Courage to Create<\/em> (1975) and <em>Freedom and Destiny<\/em> (1981). The phrasing is not identical to the version people share, so May is the best lead rather than a confirmed source.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>Where does the &#8220;between stimulus and response&#8221; quote come from in Stephen Covey&#8217;s books?<\/strong><br>\nStephen Covey wrote about the space between stimulus and response in <em>The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People<\/em> (1989), describing Viktor Frankl&#8217;s freedom to choose as lying between what happened to him and his response. The sentence in the familiar form appears in <em>First Things First<\/em> (1994), written by Covey with A. Roger Merrill and Rebecca R. Merrill. Covey said he had read the passage in a book and was giving the essence of it. He told the story several times over the years: he came across it in a university library in Hawaii, dated it to 1969 in one later account, never noted the author or title, and said that when he returned years afterwards the library building was gone.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>What did Viktor Frankl actually say about choosing your response?<\/strong><br>\nViktor Frankl&#8217;s real statement on this is in <em>Man&#8217;s Search for Meaning<\/em>, and it is a larger claim than the quote usually attributed to him. Writing about people in the concentration camps who comforted others and gave away their last piece of bread, Frankl said they were proof that everything can be taken from a person except one thing \u2014 what the English translation calls the last of the human freedoms: to choose your own attitude in any given set of circumstances, and to choose your own way. English readers meet Frankl through Ilse Lasch&#8217;s translation, and the exact wording varies slightly between editions. The popular &#8220;space between stimulus and response&#8221; line describes a technique for reacting well; Frankl&#8217;s sentence is a claim about what cannot be taken from a human being at all.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>Is &#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221; in the Bible?<\/strong><br>\nNo. &#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221; is not in the Bible, in any translation \u2014 &#8220;stimulus&#8221; and &#8220;response&#8221; are modern psychological terms and no biblical writer had them. The closest biblical description of the same pause is Proverbs 15:28, which in the King James Version reads: &#8220;The heart of the righteous studieth to answer: but the mouth of the wicked poureth out evil things.&#8221; Two people meet the same moment; one studies before answering and one simply pours. Written roughly three thousand years earlier, it places the pause in the heart rather than in the timing, treating it as a sign of what a person has become rather than a skill to be practised.<\/p>\n\n<p><strong>Is the quote &#8220;between stimulus and response lies a space&#8221; or &#8220;there is a space&#8221;?<\/strong><br>\nBoth versions circulate, along with &#8220;in the space between stimulus and response&#8221; and &#8220;the space between stimulus and response,&#8221; and that variation is itself a clue. Stephen Covey, the man who brought the sentence into wide circulation, worded it differently in different books and forewords and said openly that he was giving the essence of a passage he had read years earlier and never written down. When a quotation has no single stable wording, it usually means nobody is copying it from a printed original \u2014 they are copying it from each other.<\/p>        <div class=\"booster-block booster-reactions-block\">\n            <div class=\"twp-reactions-icons\">\n                \n                <div class=\"twp-reacts-wrap\">\n                    <a react-data=\"be-react-1\" post-id=\"119947\" class=\"be-face-icons un-reacted\" href=\"javascript:void(0)\">\n                        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/booster-extension\/\/assets\/icon\/happy.svg\" alt=\"Happy\" title=\"\">\n                    <\/a>\n                    <div class=\"twp-reaction-title\">\n                        Happy                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"twp-count-percent\">\n                                                    <span style=\"display: none;\" class=\"twp-react-count\">0<\/span>\n                        \n                                                <span class=\"twp-react-percent\"><span>0<\/span> %<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/div>\n\n                <div class=\"twp-reacts-wrap\">\n                    <a react-data=\"be-react-2\" post-id=\"119947\" class=\"be-face-icons un-reacted\" href=\"javascript:void(0)\">\n                        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/booster-extension\/\/assets\/icon\/sad.svg\" alt=\"Sad\" title=\"\">\n                    <\/a>\n                    <div class=\"twp-reaction-title\">\n                        Sad                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"twp-count-percent\">\n                                                    <span style=\"display: none;\" class=\"twp-react-count\">0<\/span>\n                                                                        <span class=\"twp-react-percent\"><span>0<\/span> %<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/div>\n\n                <div class=\"twp-reacts-wrap\">\n                    <a react-data=\"be-react-3\" post-id=\"119947\" class=\"be-face-icons un-reacted\" href=\"javascript:void(0)\">\n                        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/booster-extension\/\/assets\/icon\/excited.svg\" alt=\"Excited\" title=\"\">\n                    <\/a>\n                    <div class=\"twp-reaction-title\">\n                        Excited                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"twp-count-percent\">\n                                                    <span style=\"display: none;\" class=\"twp-react-count\">0<\/span>\n                                                                        <span class=\"twp-react-percent\"><span>0<\/span> %<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/div>\n\n                <div class=\"twp-reacts-wrap\">\n                    <a react-data=\"be-react-6\" post-id=\"119947\" class=\"be-face-icons un-reacted\" href=\"javascript:void(0)\">\n                        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/booster-extension\/\/assets\/icon\/sleepy.svg\" alt=\"Sleepy\" title=\"\">\n                    <\/a>\n                    <div class=\"twp-reaction-title\">\n                        Sleepy                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"twp-count-percent\">\n                                                    <span style=\"display: none;\" class=\"twp-react-count\">0<\/span>\n                        \n                                                <span class=\"twp-react-percent\"><span>0<\/span> %<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/div>\n\n                <div class=\"twp-reacts-wrap\">\n                    <a react-data=\"be-react-4\" post-id=\"119947\" class=\"be-face-icons un-reacted\" href=\"javascript:void(0)\">\n                        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/booster-extension\/\/assets\/icon\/angry.svg\" alt=\"Angry\" title=\"\">\n                    <\/a>\n                    <div class=\"twp-reaction-title\">Angry<\/div>\n                    <div class=\"twp-count-percent\">\n                                                    <span style=\"display: none;\" class=\"twp-react-count\">0<\/span>\n                                                                        <span class=\"twp-react-percent\"><span>0<\/span> %<\/span>\n                        \n                    <\/div>\n                <\/div>\n\n                <div class=\"twp-reacts-wrap\">\n                    <a react-data=\"be-react-5\" post-id=\"119947\" class=\"be-face-icons un-reacted\" href=\"javascript:void(0)\">\n                        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/booster-extension\/\/assets\/icon\/surprise.svg\" alt=\"Surprise\" title=\"\">\n                    <\/a>\n                    <div class=\"twp-reaction-title\">Surprise<\/div>\n                    <div class=\"twp-count-percent\">\n                                                    <span style=\"display: none;\" class=\"twp-react-count\">0<\/span>\n                                                                        <span class=\"twp-react-percent\"><span>0<\/span> %<\/span>\n                                            <\/div>\n                <\/div>\n\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\n    ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Between stimulus and response there is a space&#8221; is not in Viktor Frankl&#8217;s writing. Stephen Covey found it in a library book he never named. Here is the trail.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":119946,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_wp_convertkit_post_meta":{"form":"-1","landing_page":"0","tag":"0","restrict_content":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1723],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-119947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-quotes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119947"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119947\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":119948,"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119947\/revisions\/119948"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/119946"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bgodinspired.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}